🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial action to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are observing closely to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

The European Movement

In Europe, a rising number of nations are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that phones and apps are "taking away our youngsters' youth". Legislation could be formalized soon.
• Norway is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to confirm the user details of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an Australian-model ban remains "an measures under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has asked parliament to enact a law lifting the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has suggested a related move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has advised families to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has passed a symbolic motion calling for a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is given. Although it warns of the "addictive" design of these apps, the move does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age restriction is a solid starting point," stated one European lawmaker driving the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is being dismissed" but stressing any action must be "based on strong data".

Previously, interest grew behind a bill to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the government committed to further research the matter.

Charities have voiced warnings. An organization established by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after encountering disturbing platform posts suggests that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the inability of the tech sector to design platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for young users," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Approach

Across America, regulation is mostly occurring at the state level amid country-wide stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it faces court battles.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a rule restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional time needing adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted bills requiring parental consent for under-16s to create social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from certain individuals to mimic the Australian lead, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, additional countries are similarly exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world bodies strike a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The body notes that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to improve safety.

As this global debate continues, the steps of this nation and several other countries indicate that states internationally are less and less prepared to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.